"It was for freedom that Christ has set us free..." Gal 5:1



Archive for February, 2012

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Some people think it is a distraction. Others treat it like a discussion about big foot or the lochness monster.

I’m talking about Obama’s eligibility to be President under the Constitution. Is he indeed a natural born citizen?

If those who have made an issue of this don’t believe their own concerns and are doing this as a form of harassment they have done us all a disservice. If they believe with integrity that the question of eligibility was never properly processed than I support their right to speak out and pursue answers to their concerns.

I personally have been fascinated with the whole process. Would America have the guts, would any of it’s public servants have the guts, to actually step out and speak if indeed Obama’s eligibility were indeed a problem?

One sheriff has made this a matter of investigation. His name is Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

He is having a press release tomorrow to announce the results of the investigation that he has conducted. I believe it is the first official government investigation into Obama’s eligibility to serve as President.

(Article Continued Below)

I think you can view the press conference tomorrow (March 1, 2012) at 2pm Central Standard Time here: http://www.wnd.com/arpaio-report/. You can also sign up at that link to have the full report emailed to you.

Here is an article about the whole thing at WND.com:

Poll after poll in recent months has indicated that Americans have a high level of concern over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, with one poll showing fully half of the nation wants Congress to investigate the question.

But reporters for the traditional media – networks, major newspapers, major news corporations and conglomerates – mostly have giggled when talk turns to the serious question of just what the U.S. Constitution requires of presidents.

Nevertheless, media organizations from all political persuasions are seeking admittance to a news conference to be held by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz…  [Read More]

Most of the people that I have talked to about don’t even seem to know what the issue is. Friends have said “but of course he is a citizen!” That isn’t the question. The question is this: “Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?” Those are the exact conditions given by the Constitution. Attaining citizenship does not make one eligible to be president. Being a “natural born” citizen does.

I suspect that history will record that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii to one United States Citizen and that makes him a Natural Born United States Citizen. We’ll find out more tomorrow I suppose.

You can read the actual wording of the Constitution here: http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html

Look for Article II, Section 1., Clause 4.

The Constitution does not specifically define what Natural Born Citizen means, thus the controversy.

So tell me what you think. Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen? Was he born in Hawaii? Was he born in Kenya? What about it all?

Comments No Comments »

From WND.com:

Homeschooling families will soon be forbidden from teaching that homosexual sex is sinful as part of their schooling program, according to the government of Alberta, Canada.

Under the province’s Education Act, homeschoolers and religious schools will be banned from “disrespecting” people’s differences, Alberta Education Minister Thomas Lukaszuk’s office told LifeSiteNews just last week.

“Whatever the nature of schooling – homeschool, private school, Catholic school – we do not tolerate disrespect for differences,” said Donna McColl, Lukaszuk’s assistant director of communications. “You can affirm the family’s ideology in your family life, you just can’t do it as part of your educational study and instruction.”  [Read More]

Comments No Comments »

From Telegraph.co.uk:

Almost hourly last week I followed yet another child-snatching drama, as bizarre and disturbing as any I have reported. So irked were the social workers of an English council when, six months ago, a mother and her 14-year-old son evaded their clutches by fleeing to Ireland that they hit on a cunning ruse. They tracked down the woman’s former husband, who had not seen his son for seven years, and paid for him to go to Dublin to front a case for “child abduction”, on the grounds that his son had been taken abroad without his consent.

The judge, relying on a document supplied at the last minute by the English social workers, which the mother and son were not allowed to see or challenge, ruled – in defiance of the UN Convention on Children’s Rights and a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights – that the boy must be returned to England. He was so distraught that he attempted suicide, spending two days in hospital before waiting in council care to be deported.  [Read More]

Comments No Comments »

%d bloggers like this: